Static-99/Static-99R
Overview
The Static-99 is a ten item actuarial assessment instrument created by R. Karl Hanson, Ph.D. and David Thornton, Ph.D. for use with adult male sexual offenders who are at least 18 year of age at time of release to the community. It is the most widely used sex offender risk assessment instrument in the world, and is extensively used in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and many European nations.
This site is dedicated to the community of Static-99 users, and governed by an Advisory Board whose members approve and submit content, and rotate responsibility for answering Static-99 coding questions. Our intent is to provide useful information in a timely manner, and to promote best practices in sexual offender assessment among professionals who routinely use the instrument.
Coding questions may be submitted to Dr. Karl Williams; please consult the coding manual and FAQs prior to submission. Routine questions will be answered by the Site Manager, who has the full confidence of the Static-99 developers. Complex questions will be referred by the Site Manager to the Advisory Board for discussion and a response will be forwarded to the requestor as quickly as possible (in most cases within 5 business days).
Veuillez envoyer les questions en français à Dr. Claire Ducro.
Documents
Static-2002 Training
- Upcoming Static-2002R training in Ottawa, Canada
Static-99 Training
Note that training on Static-99 is sufficient to score Static-99R given that the only difference between the scales is different weights for the age item.
Static-2002/R
We recommend evaluators use Static-2002R instead of Static-2002.
Static-2002R
Note that Static-99/R training is not sufficient to score Static-2002/R. We recommend that evaluators obtain Static-2002/R training before using the scale.
Coding Materials*
*Note that the Static-2002 coding rules apply to all Static-2002R items, with the exception that the age item has updated weights
Reporting Static-2002R Results
Certified Static-2002R Trainers
Upcoming Static-2002R training in Ottawa, Canada
Static-2002
For research regarding Static-2002/R, please see ‘Research’ section of the website.
Static-99 & Related Risk Assessment Research
Static-99R and Static-2002R
- New age weights: Developing Static-99R and Static-2002R
- Babchishin, Hanson, & Helmus (2011). The RRASOR, Static-99R and Static-2002R all add incrementally to the prediction of recidivism among sex offenders (Corrections Research User Report 2011-01). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Public Safety.
Given that only the age item has changed for the revised Static scales, research regarding the original scales can be considered roughly applicable to the revised scales as well.
Static-99
- Helmus (2009). Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates: Exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples. MA thesis.
- This thesis can also be obtained from Digital Dissertations: Helmus, L. (2009). Re-norming Static-99 recidivism estimates: Exploring base rate variability across sex offender samples (Master’s thesis). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. MR58443).
- Thornton, Hanson, & Helmus (2009). Moving beyond the standard model of actuarial assessment for sex offenders. Perspectives: Quarterly Newsletter of the California Coalition on Sexual Offending, p. 1-4.
- Annotated bibliography of Static-99 Replications (2008), with tables:
- Hanson (2006). Does Static-99 predict recidivism among older sexual offenders? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 343-355.
- Hanson & Thornton (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 119-136.
Static-2002
- Hanson, Helmus, & Thornton (2010). Predicting recidivism amongst sexual offenders: A multi-site study of Static-2002. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 198-211.
- Helmus & Hanson (2007). Predictive validity of the Static-99 and Static-2002 for sex offenders on community supervision. Sexual Offender Treatment, 2(2), 1-14.
- Hanson & Thornton (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002 (Corrections Research User Report 2003-01). Ottawa, ON: Solicitor General of Canada.
Other Research on Sex Offender Risk Assessment
- Hanson & Morton-Bourgon (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
- Hanson, Harris, Scott, & Helmus (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Corrections Research User Report 2007-05). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety Canada.
- Hanson & Morton-Bourgon (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (Corrections Research User Report 2004-02). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
- Harris & Hanson (2004). Sex offender recidivism: A simple question (Corrections Research User Report 2004-03). Ottawa, ON: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
- Hanson & Harris (1998). Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism (Corrections Research User Report 1998-01). Ottawa, ON: Solicitor General of Canada.
Ongoing Research
- Info on research studies underway - coming soon
- Data Collection/Coding Standards - coming soon
Norms
- Static-99R Coding Form
- Static-99R: Revised Age Weights
- Reporting Static-99 in Light of New Research on Recidivism Norms - This article appeared in the newsletter for the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, The Forum, 21 (1), Winter 2009, p. 38-45.
- Reporting Static-99 Scores
- Resources – The following includes a template and an example of how evaluators can report Static-99 scores using the 2008 norms. This is only an example, and evaluators should use their professional judgment concerning the preferred wording, taking into consideration the purpose of the assessment and the expected readers of the report. Evaluators should feel free to download and edit the WORD document as they see fit
- Tables
- Research (e.g., presentations, articles)
- More detailed resources